Texas Ballot Initiatives - 2001

6 November 2001 is election day in Texas, and there will be 19 constitutional amendments to the Texas Constitution which will be voted on. Below is a link to a site that will provide the order in which the amendments will appear on the ballot, as well as an explaination of each, both in English and Spanish.

It is important, as a Texan, to be aware of these amendments, and to vote on those of concern to you.

November 6, 2001 Constitutional Amendments

Additional information on voter issues in Texas can be found at the site of the Texas Secretary of State. Search Engine Links Page

Search Engines

State Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms Provisions, by Date
State Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms Provisions, by Date

Prof. Eugene Volokh, UCLA Law School *


Legend: New text is set in bold; relatively insubstantial changes set in small type.
To see the constitutional provisions sorted by state, and with complete citations, click here.


1776 North Carolina: That the people have a right to bear arms, for the defence of the State; and, as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

1776 Pennsylvania: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state; and as standing armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination, to, and governed by, the civil power.

1777 Vermont: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State -- and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.

1780 Massachusetts: The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.

1790 Pennsylvania: The right of the citizens to bear arms in defence of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

1792 Kentucky: That the right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

1796 Tennessee: That the freemen of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence.

1799 Kentucky: That the rights of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

1802 Ohio: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State; and as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be kept up, and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to the civil power.

1816 Indiana: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State, and that the military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power.

1817 Mississippi: Every citizen has a right to bear arms, in defence of himself and the State.

1818 Connecticut: Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.

1819 Maine: Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms for the common defence; and this right shall never be questioned.

1819 Alabama: That every citizen has a right to bear arms in defence of himself and the state.

1820 Missouri: That the people have the right peaceably to assemble for their common good, and to apply to those vested with the powers of government for redress of grievances by petition or remonstrance; and that their right to bear arms in defence of themselves and of the State cannot be questioned.

1832 Mississippi: Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defence of himself and of the State.

1834 Tennessee: That the free white men of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence.

1835 Michigan: Every person has a right to bear arms for the defence of himself and the State.

1836 Texas: Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defence of himself and the republic. The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.

1836 Arkansas: That the free white men of this State shall have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence.

1838 Florida: That the free white men of this State shall have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence.

1842 Rhode Island: The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1845 Texas: Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in lawful defence of himself or the State.

1850 Kentucky: That the rights of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned; but the General Assembly may pass laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed arms.

1850 Michigan: Every person has a right to bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

1851 Ohio: The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.

1851 Indiana: The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State [military subordination clause removed].

1857 Oregon: The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power[.]

1859 Kansas: The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.

1865 Missouri: That the people have the right peaceably to assemble for their common good, and to apply to those vested with the powers of government for redress of grievances by petition or remonstrance; and that their right to bear arms in defence of themselves and of the lawful authority of the State cannot be questioned.

1865 Georgia: A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1865 Florida: Clause omitted.

1868 Texas: Every person shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defence of himself or the State, under such regulations as the legislature may prescribe.

1868 North Carolina: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up, and the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

1868 Florida: The people shall have the right to bear arms in defence of themselves and of the lawful authority of the State.

1868 South Carolina: The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defence. As, in times of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly. The military power of the State shall always be held in subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it.

1868 Mississippi: All persons shall have a right to keep and bear arms for their defence.

1868 Georgia: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free people, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; but the general assembly shall have power to prescribe by law the manner in which arms may be borne.

1868 Arkansas: The citizens of this State shall have the right to keep and bear arms for their common defense.

1870 Tennessee: That the citizens of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defense; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime.

1875 Missouri: That the right of no citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power, when thereto legally summoned, shall be called into question; but nothing herein contained is intended to justify the practice of wearing concealed weapons.

1875 North Carolina: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up, and the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein contained shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the Legislature from enacting penal statutes against said practice.

1876 Colorado: The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.

1876 Texas: Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.

1877 Georgia: [Militia clause deleted.] The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, but the General Assembly shall have power to prescribe the manner in which arms may be borne.

1879 Louisiana: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged. This shall not prevent the passage of laws to punish those who carry weapons concealed.

1885 Florida: The right of the people to bear arms in defence of themselves and the lawful authority of the State, shall not be infringed, but the Legislature may prescribe the manner in which they may be borne.

1889 Washington: The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

1889 Wyoming: The right of citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied.

1889 South Dakota: The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be denied.

1889 Montana: The right of any person to keep or bear arms in defense of his own home, person, and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but nothing herein contained shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.

1889 Idaho: The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense; but the Legislature shall regulate the exercise of this right by law.

1890 Mississippi: The right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but the legislature may regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons.

1891 Kentucky: All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned: First: The right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties. . . . Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.

1895 South Carolina: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. As, in times of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly. The military power of the State shall always be held in subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it.

1896 Utah: The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense, but the legislature may regulate the exercise of this right by law.

1901 Alabama: That every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.

1907 Oklahoma: The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power, when thereunto legally summoned, shall never be prohibited; but nothing herein contained shall prevent the Legislature from regulating the carrying of weapons.

1912 Arizona: The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.

1912 New Mexico: The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.

1945 Missouri: That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.

1950 Hawaii: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1959 Alaska: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1963 Michigan: Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

1968 Florida: The right of the people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law.

1970 Illinois: Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1971 North Carolina: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained, and the military shall be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein [word omitted] shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the General Assembly from enacting penal statutes against that practice.

1971 New Mexico: No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.

1971 Virginia: That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

1974 Louisiana: [Militia clause deleted.] The right of each citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person.

1978 Idaho: The people have the right to keep and bear arms [qualifiers omitted], which right shall not be abridged; but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to govern the carrying of weapons concealed on the person nor prevent passage of legislation providing minimum sentences for crimes committed while in possession of a firearm, nor prevent the passage of legislation providing penalties for the possession of firearms by a convicted felon, nor prevent the passage of any legislation punishing the use of a firearm. No law shall impose licensure, registration or special taxation on the ownership or possession of firearms or ammunition. Nor shall any law permit the confiscation of firearms, except those actually used in the commission of a felony.

1982 Nevada: Every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes.

1982 New Hampshire: All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state.

1984 North Dakota: All individuals are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation; pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness; and to keep and bear arms for the defense of their person, family, property, and the state, and for lawful hunting, recreational, and other lawful purposes, which shall not be infringed.

1984 Utah: The individual right of the people to keep and bear arms for security and defense of self, family, others, property, or the state, as well as for other lawful purposes shall not be infringed; but nothing herein shall prevent the legislature from defining the lawful use of arms.

1986 West Virginia: A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for lawful hunting and recreational use.

1986 New Mexico: No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.

1987 Delaware: A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and State, and for hunting and recreational use.

1987 Maine: Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms [for the common defence omitted] and this right shall never be questioned.

1988 Nebraska: All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights; among these are life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the right to keep and bear arms for security or defense of self, family, home, and others, and for lawful common defense, hunting, recreational use, and all other lawful purposes, and such rights shall not be denied or infringed by the state or any subdivision thereof. To secure these rights, and the protection of property, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

1990 Florida: (a) The right of the people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law. (b) There shall be a mandatory period of three days, excluding weekends and legal holidays, between the purchase and delivery at retail of any handgun. For the purposes of this section, "purchase" means the transfer of money or other valuable consideration to the retailer, and "handgun" means a firearm capable of being carried and used by one hand, such as a pistol or revolver. Holders of a concealed weapon permit as prescribed in Florida law shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph. (c) The legislature shall enact legislation implementing subsection (b) of this section, effective no later than December 31, 1991, which shall provide that anyone violating the provisions of subsection (b) shall be guilty of a felony. (d) This restriction shall not apply to a trade in of another handgun.

1994 Alaska: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be denied or infringed by the State or a political subdivision of the State.

1998 Wisconsin: The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose.

News Links Texas State Elected Officials
Members whose names are bolded represent constituencies in San Antonio and/or Bexar County.

State-Wide Office Holders

List of Senate Members

District 1 Republican
Bill Ratliff
District 2 Republican
Bob Deuell
District 3 Republican
Todd Staples
District 4 Republican
Tommy Williams
District 5 Republican
Steve Ogden
District 6 Democrat
Mario Gallegos
District 7 Republican
Jon Lindsey
District 8 Republican
Florence Shapiro
District 9 Republican
Chris Harris
District 10 Republican
Kim Brimer
District 11 Republican
Mike Jackson
District 12 Republican
Jane Nelson
District 13 Democrat
Rodney G. Ellis
District 14 Democrat
Gonzalo Barrientos
District 15 Democrat
John Whitmire
District 16 Republican
John J. Carona
District 17 Republican
Kyle Janek
District 18 Democrat
Kenneth L. (Ken) Armbrister
District 19 Democrat
Frank Madla
District 20 Democrat
Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa
District 21 Democrat
Judith Zaffirini
District 22 Republican
Kip Averitt
District 23 Democrat
Royce West
District 24 Republican
Troy Frasier
District 25 Republican
Jeff Wentworth
District 26 Democrat
Leticia R. Van de Putte
District 27 Democrat
Eduardo A. (Eddie) Lucio, Jr
District 28 Republican
Robert L. Duncan
District 29 Democrat
Eliot Shapleigh
District 30 Republican
Craig Estes
District 31 Republican
Teel Bivins
N/A N/A
N/A

List of House Members

District 1 Democrat
Barry Telford
District 2 Republican
Dan Flynn
District 3 Democrat
Mark Homer
District 4 Republican
Betty Brown
District 5 Republican
Bryan Hughes
District 6 Republican
Leo Berman
District 7 Republican
Tommy Merritt
District 8 Republican
Byron Cook
District 9 Republican
Wayne Christian
District 10 Republican
Jim Pitts
District 11 Democrat
Chuck Hopson
District 12 Democrat
Jim McReynolds
District 13 Republican
Lois Kolkhorst
District 14 Republican
Fred Brown
District 15 Republican
Rob Eissler
District 16 Republican
Reuben Hope, Jr.
District 17 Democrat
Robert "Robby" Cook
District 18 Democrat
Dan Ellis
District 19 Republican
Mike "Tuffy" Hamilton
District 20 Republican
Dan Gattis
District 21 Democrat
Allan Ritter
District 22 Democrat
Joseph 'Joe' Deshotel
District 23 Democrat
Craig Eiland
District 24 Republican
Larry Taylor
District 25 Republican
Dennis Bonnen
District 26 Republican
Charlie Howard
District 27 Democrat
Dora Olivo
District 28 Republican
Glenn Hegar
District 29 Republican
Glenda Dawson
District 30 Republican
Geanie Morrison
District 31 Democrat
Ryan Gullen
District 32 Republican
Gene Seaman
District 33 Democrat
Vilma Luna
District 34 Democrat
Jaime Capelo
District 35 Democrat
Gabi Canales
District 36 Democrat
Ismael 'Kino' Flores
District 37 Democrat
Rene Oliveria
District 38 Democrat
Jim Solis
District 39 Democrat
Miguel 'Mike' Wise
District 40 Democrat
Aaron Pena
District 41 Democrat
Roberto Gutierrez
District 42 Democrat
Richard Raymond
District 43 Democrat
Irma Rangel
District 44 Republican
Edmund Kuempel
District 45 Democrat
Patrick Rose
District 46 Democrat
Dawnna Dukes
District 47 Republican
Terry Keel
District 48 Republican
Todd Baxter
District 49 Democrat
Elliott Naishtat
District 50 Republican
Jack Stick
District 51 Democrat
Eddie Rodriguez
District 52 Republican
Mike Krusee
District 53 Republican
Harvey Hilderbran
District 54 Republican
Suzanna Gratia Hupp
District 55 Republican
Dianne White Delisi
District 56 Democrat
John Mabry
District 57 Democrat
Jim Dunnam
District 58 Republican
Arlene Wohlgemuth
District 59 Democrat
Sid Miller
District 60 Republican
Jim Keffer
District 61 Republican
Phil King
District 62 Republican
Larry Phillips
District 63 Republican
Mary Denny
District 64 Republican
Myra Crownover
District 65 Republican
Burt Solomons
District 66 Republican
Brian McCall
District 67 Republican
Jerry Madden
District 68 Republican
Richard 'Rick' Hardcastle
District 69 Democrat
David Farabee
District 70 Republican
Ken Paxton
District 71 Republican
Bob Hunter
District 72 Republican
Scott Campbell
District 73 Republican
Carter Casteel
District 74 Democrat
Pete Gallego
District 75 Democrat
Chente Quintanilla
District 76 Democrat
Norma Chavez
District 77 Democrat
Paul Moreno
District 78 Republican
Patrick 'Pat' Haggerty
District 79 Democrat
Joseph 'Joe' Pickett
District 80 Democrat
Timoteo Garza
District 81 Republican
G.E. 'Buddy' West
District 82 Republican
Tom Craddick
District 83 Republican
Delwin Jones
District 84 Republican
Carl Isett
District 85 Democrat
James 'Pete' Laney
District 86 Republican
John Smithee
District 87 Democrat
David Swinford
District 88 Democrat
Warren Chisum
District 89 Republican
Jodie Laubenberg
District 90 Democrat
Lon Burnam
District 91 Republican
Bob Griggs
District 92 Republican
Todd Smith
District 93 Republican
Toby Goodman
District 94 Republican
Kent Grusendorf
District 95 Democrat
Glenn Lewis
District 96 Republican
William "Bill" Zedler
District 97 Republican
Anna Mowery
District 98 Republican
Vicki Truitt
District 99 Republican
Charlie Geren
District 100 Democrat
Terri Hodge
District 101 Republican
Elvira Reyna
District 102 Republican
Tony Goolsby
District 103 Democrat
Steven Wolens
District 104 Democrat
Roberto Alonzo
District 105 Republican
Linda Harper-Brown
District 106 Republican
Ray Allen
District 107 Republican
Bill Keffer
District 108 Republican
Dan Branch
District 109 Democrat
Helen Giddings
District 110 Democrat
Jesse Jones
District 111 Democrat
Yvonne Davis
District 112 Republican
Fred Hill
District 113 Republican
Joe Driver
District 114 Republican
Will Hartnett
District 115 Republican
Kenny Marchant
District 116 Democrat
Trey Martinez Fischer
District 117 Republican
Ken Mercer
District 118 Democrat
Carlos Uresti
District 119 Democrat
Robert Puente
District 120 Democrat
Ruth Jones McClendon
District 121 Republican
Elizabeth Ames Jones
District 122 Republican
Frank Corte, Jr.
District 123 Democrat
Michael "Mike" Villarreal
District 124 Democrat
Jose Menendez
District 125 Democrat
Joaquin Castro
District 126 Republican
Peggy Hamric
District 127 Republican
Joe Crabb
District 128 Republican
Wayne Smith
District 129 Republican
John Davis
District 130 Republican
Corbin Van Arsdale
District 131 Democrat
Ron Wilson
District 132 Republican
William "Bill" Callegari
District 133 Republican
Joe Nixon
District 134 Republican
Martha Wong
District 135 Republican
Gary Elkins
District 136 Republican
Beverly Woolley
District 137 Democrat
Scott Hochberg
District 138 Republican
Dwayne Bohac
District 139 Democrat
Sylvester Turner
District 140 Democrat
Kevin Bailey
District 141 Democrat
Senfronia Thompson
District 142 Democrat
Harold Dutton Jr.
District 143 Democrat
Joe Moreno
District 144 Republican
Robert Talton
District 145 Democrat
Rick Noriega
District 146 Democrat
Al Edwards
District 147 Democrat
Garnet Coleman
District 148 Democrat
Jessica Farrar
District 149 Republican
Talmadge, Heflin
District 150 Republican
Debbie Riddle
LDS Terminology Page

Terminology - Understanding the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Obviously, I am not in this short space going to be able to tell you everything there is to know about my church. My purpose here is to explain certain terms, understood by members of the Church, with which you may not be familiar with. If you are interested in finding out more about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints itself, I would refer you to this most excellent website. The author has done a remarkable job, much better than anything I could do. Another good source is Mormons.org. I should also add that the definitions here are my own (or ones I have found in other sources), and are not officially authorized or sanctioned by the Church. I have made every effort at accuracy and consistency, but mistakes, due to my inadequate understanding, may occur.

First, you need to understand that the LDS church is highly organized with a well-defined, hierarchical structure. Everything is broken down by geographical areas, with presiding authorities assigned to oversee the activities of these areas. For purposes of this discussion, I am only going to focus on two of these areas; the "ward", and the "stake". I will add more terms as the need arises.

Ward: A "Ward" can best be described as a "congregation". The congregation consists of all members of the church that live within a certain geographical boundary, known as the "ward boundary". All church members residing within that boundary are members of that ward, and will attend church services together at a specific time. A ward is presided over by a bishop, who is assisted by two counselors.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is perhaps unique in that we time-share our chapels. That is, instead of having multiple services on Sunday, and leaving it up to the individual which service they want to attend, each ward is assigned a different meeting time at the same building. You attend Sacrament service with your ward. For example, a single chapel may service three wards. They may meet at 0800, 1030, and 1500, with the first ward at 0800, the second at 1030, and the third at 1500. This ensures a more-or-less even distribution of people at each service. Each ward is a self-contained unit. There is no one preacher preaching at each service. In fact, there is no "preacher" at all! Another difference with the LDS church is that we are a lay church. We have no paid clergy. Talks are given each Sunday (except fast Sunday) by members of the congregation who are called by the Bishopric beforehand to give a talk on a particular topic. Even the Bishop and his counselors are called to serve from the congregation. (The Bishop is called by the Stake President, and the Bishop then calls his counselors). The entire church is staffed at the Stake and Ward levels by regular people with regular jobs who have been called to perform service for the church. Callings range from Bishop to the person responsible for printing the church bulletin every Sunday. And just so someone doesn't get "stuck" always going to church at 0800 in the morning, the wards rotate their start times at the beginning of each year.

Stake: A larger geographical boundary comprised of multiple wards. A Stake is presided over by a Stake President, who is also assisted by two counselors. (NOTE: This concept of a leader assisted by two counselors is a pattern that repeats itself throughout all leadership positions in the church.)

The Stake I live in is the San Antonio Stake. It is one of four Stakes comprising San Antonio and the surrounding area. It is composed of six wards. The size of a ward is determined by the number of members who live within its ward boundaries. This is pretty much the number of people that will comfortably fit in the Sanctuary hall during Sacrament meeting. When a ward gets too large, a ward "split" occurs. A new ward is formed by readjusting the boundaries of the other existing wards. When a Stake gets to a certain size, the same happens there, with a "Stake split". Since the ward (and Stake) boundaries are determined by the number of members in the area, the geographical size of these entities is not a constant. Some are physically large, and others are quite small, depending on the member "population density".

Family Home Evening: Family Home Evening is a weekly observance of Latter-day Saints for spiritual training and social activity, usually held on Monday evenings. This observance was established in 1915 by the First Presidency of the Church, who wrote: "We advise and urge the inauguration of a 'Home Evening' throughout the Church, at which time fathers and mothers may gather their boys and girls about them in the home and teach them the word of the Lord... This 'Home Evening' should be devoted to prayer, singing hymns, songs, instrumental music, scripture-reading, family topics and specific instruction on the principles of the Gospel, and on the ethical problems of life, as well as the duties and obligation of children to parents, the home, the Church, society, and the Nation".

Between 1915 and the 1960s a large proportion of Church membership shifted from a family-centered rural population to an urban one. This change brought renewed emphasis from the First Presidency on the importance of the family. In 1970, Monday eveningwas formaly designated as Family Home Evenin, Churchwide, with nocompeting ecclesiastical functions to be held. Manuals and guides have been prepared by the Church to assist families in implementing the program.

A typical Family Home Evening might proceed thusly: A parent or older child, whose turn it is to plan the lession, selects a lesson (example: "Heavenly Father PRovided Us a Savior") from the Family Home Evening Resource Book. After an opening hymn and prayer, the lesson material, adapted to the needs and interest level of the family members, is presented. After the lesson the family discusses family schedules, family business, and special concerns. A family activity follows that helps strengthen bonds of love among family members. This could be any activity that the family enjoys doing together, such as playing a game, helping the needy, gardening, or attending a cultural event. Following the activity, the family kneels in family prayer and then often enjoys refreshments. Single adults or others who live alone may join in as a group to participate in Family Home Evening activities, or they may observe appropriately modified weekly activities individually. Home evening activities allow for considerable variation in the desires and needs of each family or group. Always however, the emphasis is spiritual enrichment. For more information on the Family Home Evening, see Mormons.org. Some of the material on this topic was excerpted from this source.

Fireside: In general, a church-related meeting in a less-formal setting for the presentation of a particular topic. Typical format would be opening prayer, some hymns, and talks by one or more speakers, discussion, closing prayer, and refreshments. There are many kinds of "firesides"; youth firesides, single adult firesides, etc. Firesides tend to be more interactive. They can be for a single ward, multiple wards, a single stake, or multiple stakes. They can be church-wide, broadcast via satellite. In this case, of course, they are not interactive, but take on the characteristics of FDR's famous "fireside chats".

First Presidency: The First Presidency is the governing body of and highest ranking quorum in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Its authority, duties, and responsibilities extend over every person and all matters in the Church. This quorum usually consists of three persons--the president of the Church and two counselors selected by the President. It has happened in the past that a Church president has called more than two counselors to assist him. It could happen again in the future. Members of the First Presidency are not coequal. The authority rests solely with the President. The counselors have a subordinate role, with the first counselor having precedence over the second. In the absence of the President, the counselors preside in meetings with the Council or Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and other General Authorities, and in the conferences of the Church. If the President is ill and unable to carry out all his functions, the counselors may conduct the affairs of the Church under his direction. In such a case the counnselors operate in close consultation with the President of the Council of the Twelve. However, the President of the Church remains the final authority.

The selection of the counselors is the perogative of the President. A new President may or may not choose to retain the counselors of his predecessor. The counselors are usuallyapostles, but in a few cases men have been called who were not ordained apostles, In some cases, the counselors have been apostles, but not members of the Twelve. The general membership of the Church votes to sustain the First Presidency but does not elect them. Because members of the Church believe that the calling and authority of the First Presidency come from God, their vote is one of common consent, to ratify or oppose a selection that has already been made. For more information on the First Presidency, see Mormons.org. The material on this topic was excerpted from this source.

High Council: The high council is a body of twelve high priests who are called and set apart in each stake to assist and advise the stake presidency under whom they serve. From Mormons.org:

Under the direction of the stake presidency, the high council has important executive, legislative, and judicial powers. Members of stake high council serve as advisers to the stake presidency on any matter about which the presidency might seek counsel, and they carry out specific assignments. For example, a high councilor may have an assignment to represent the stake presidency, to assist in the training of a new ward bishopric, to attend a ward's priesthood executive committee meetings and ward council meetings, or to train and advise ward Melchizedek Priesthood quorum leaders. He may be asked to report regularly to the stake presidency concerning the status of a particular ward. In addition, he may serve as a member of the stake Melchizedek Priesthood committee, which assists the stake presidency in installing, training, and advising Melchizedek Priesthood leaders. Other assignments that are generally given to a member of a high council include membership on the Aaronic Priesthood/Boy Scouting Committee; adviser to the stake young women organization; stake mission president; coordinator of stake welfare programs; coordinator for temple service and family history programs; stake emergency preparedness director, or other such administrative roles. A high councilor will usually also be assigned to speak periodically in ward Sacrament meetings under the direction of the stake presidency.

As part of the stake high council, the presidency presents matters of busines to the council for its approval. Such matters may include endorsing an individual's name for an assignment in the stake organization, recommending a person as a potential ward bishop or counselor in a bishopric, or considering an individual for ordination to an office in the Melchizedek Priesthood. The stake president may also ask for discussion of particular issues and high councilors may be asked to report on the status of their assignments.

As part of its judicial function, the high council serves as a disciplinary council when convened by the stake president to consider cases of serious transgression that affect the standing or fellowship of a Church member. Following the presentation of the facts of the case and due deliberation and prayer, a decision is rendered by the stake president and ratified by the stake high council. News Links Texas State and Congressional Elected Officials

Federal

U.S Senate

Republican
John Cornyn
Republican
Kay Bailey Hutchison

U.S. House of Representatives

District 1 Democrat
Max A. Sandlin, Jr.
District 2 Republican
James Turner
District 3 Republican
Samuel R. Johnson
District 4 Democrat
Ralph Moody Hall
District 5 Republican
Peter A. Sessions
District 6 Republican
Joe Linus Barton
District 7 Republican
John A. Culberson
District 8 Republican
Kevin P. Brady
District 9 Democrat
Nicholas V. Lampson
District 10 Democrat
Lloyd A. Doggett
District 11 Democrat
Thomas Edwards
District 12 Republican
Kay Granger
District 13 Republican
'Mac' Thornberry
District 14 Republican
Ronald E. Paul
District 15 Democrat
Reuben E. Hinojosa
District 16 Democrat
Silvestre Reyes
District 17 Democrat
Charles W. Stenholm
District 18 Democrat
Sheila Jackson Lee
District 19 Republican
Larry Combest
District 20 Democrat
Charles A. Gonzalez
District 21 Republican
Lamar Smith
District 22 Republican
JThomas Dale DeLay
District 23 Republican
Henry Bonilla
District 24 Democrat
James Turner
District 25 Democrat
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr.
District 26 Republican
Richard K. Armey
District 27 Democrat
Soloman P. Ortiz
District 28 Democrat
Ciro D. Rodriguez
District 29 Democrat
Raymond Eugene Green
District 30 Democrat
Eddie Bernice Johnson